Skip to content

Cart

Your cart is empty

Continue shopping
L-01 Serum + Moisturizer
L-01™ · THE SCIENCE

SKIN THAT BOUNCES BACK.

Signaling peptides that survive, and arrive.

L-01 delivers signaling peptides, the messenger molecules skin uses to renew itself, on a plant carrier that keeps them intact and carries them deeper.

56% Improvement in firmness in 28 days1
8 in 10 Saw a measurable decrease in under-eye wrinkles1
Day 14 Visible wrinkle improvement. Retinol took until day 30.3
0 Reactions in 51 people with sensitive skin2

SEVEN STUDIES. ONE FORMULA.

From the lab bench to clinical studies, L-01 was tested by independent research labs before it reached you.

7 Studies
184 People in 4 human studies
2 Head-to-head comparisons: vs placebo and vs retinol
CLINICAL · L-01 FORMULA

WHAT 28 DAYS LOOKS LIKE

A 28-day single-center clinical study. 29 women, ages 25–54, applied the L-01 formula twice daily to the face.1

Before
Before
After 28 days
After
AT DAY 28
57% Improvement in hydration1
56% Improvement in firmness1
56% Reduction in wrinkles1
61% Reduction in redness1
8 in 10 Saw a measurable decrease in under-eye wrinkles (VISIA-CR)1
8 in 10 Saw a measurable improvement in skin barrier (Tewameter)1
CLINICAL · L-01 INGREDIENTS

TESTED AGAINST PLACEBO. THEN AGAINST RETINOL.

Two independent clinical studies tested the L-01 signaling-peptide ingredients against a placebo cream and against 0.3% retinol.3

VS 0.3% RETINOL · 44 PEOPLE · 60 DAYS3
Visible wrinkle improvement by day 14. Retinol took until day 30.
L-01 ingredientsDay 140.3% retinolDay 300143060
L-01 ingredientsDay 140.3% retinolDay 300143060
−18.6%
Max wrinkle depth, day 14
−25.5%
Max wrinkle depth, day 30
77%
Smoother skin, day 30 (retinol 59%)
VS PLACEBO · 60 PEOPLE · 28 DAYS3
FIRMNESS, DAY 14p=0.0003
L-01 ingredients+21.8%
Placebo+2.5%
DARK SPOTS, DAY 28p<0.0001
L-01 ingredients−18.0%
Placebo+2.0% (no improvement)
BARRIER WATER LOSS, DAY 28p=0.0004
L-01 ingredients−16.9%
Placebo−5.1%
HOW IT WORKS

THREE HALLMARKS OF AGING. ONE COMPLEX.

Scientists describe aging as a set of connected “hallmarks”.A In skin, three of them show up as changes you can see. UV light and oxidative stress speed them up.

L-01 was tested on skin cells after UV and oxidative damage. Here is each hallmark, and what L-01 did.5

01 · STRUCTURE BREAKS DOWN

72% of UV-induced collagen loss prevented5

Collagen I in UV-aged skin cells, without and with L-01
UV-aged · UV-aged + L-01. Green = collagen I.

The problem: Collagen and elastin keep skin firm and springy. With age and UV, they break down. You see: lines, loss of firmness.

With L-01: Protects skin’s support matrix of collagen and elastin, even after UV damage.

02 · AGING CELLS LINGER

−47% senescence marker P165

P16 in stressed skin cells, without and with L-01
Stressed · Stressed + L-01. Green = P16.

The problem: Senescent cells stop renewing but don’t go away, and they release inflammatory signals that age the cells around them.A You see: dullness, redness, sensitivity.

With L-01: Fewer signs of cellular aging and calmer inflammatory signals, even after oxidative damage.

03 · REPAIR SLOWS

+19% faster wound-gap closure5

Wound-gap closure at 0 and 24 hours, untreated and with L-01
Top: untreated. Bottom: L-01. 0 and 24 hours.

The problem: Older skin repairs more slowly.F You see: marks that linger, slower recovery.

With L-01: Skin cells close a wound gap faster.

See all 7 markers

7 of 7 markers moved toward the healthy state · all p<0.05. % change vs stressed cells without L-01.

MarkerChange
Collagen I (after UV)+61%
Elastin (after UV)+17%
MMP-1, collagen-cutting enzyme (after UV)−9%
P16, senescence marker (after oxidative stress)−47%
IL-6, inflammatory signal−14%
TNF-α, inflammatory signal−13%
Cell migration, vs untreated+19%

No cell toxicity up to about 4× the test dose (≥95% viability).5 Lab results on skin cells (dermal fibroblasts). Our full study is being prepared for peer-reviewed publication.

LAB · L-01 INGREDIENTS

A DELIVERY BREAKTHROUGH

We bound growth-factor peptides to oleosomes: natural oil bodies from plant seeds. The result: signaling peptides that hold up under heat stress and reach the layer of skin where collagen is made.

01 · SURVIVES

After 12 weeks of heat stress, 92% intact. On its own, only 8% survived.4

0%50%100%0481292%8%
0%50%100%0481292%8%
With oleosome Naked EGFWeeks at 42°C

Measures intact protein (SDS-PAGE), not biological activity. EGF shown.

02 · ARRIVES

Without a carrier, it never reached the dermis. With oleosomes, it did.44

WITH OLEOSOMEWITHOUTEpidermis on top · dermis below
WITH OLEOSOMEWITHOUTEpidermis on top · dermis below

Ex vivo lab skin model (EpiDermFT), FGF-2, single time point. Illustration.

OUR ORIGIN · STEM CELL SCIENCE

BORN FROM STEM CELL SCIENCE

In the lab, developing L-01
In the lab, developing L-01.

Stem cells are skin’s repair crew: they send the regenerative signals that tell skin to renew. With age, those signals fade.A Our founding insight: aging skin still has the capacity to repair. It’s missing the signals that trigger it.

  1. 01
    Engineered Stem Cells

    Our founder and two senior scientists developed and patented Engineered Stem Cells (ESC): synthetic cells that replicate the regenerative signals healthy stem cells produce.

  2. 02
    AI-guided signal selection

    Our research parent company, Stemtology, built an AI discovery platform with Microsoft AI Co-Innovation Labs to find signals that work together across skin-aging pathways.

  3. 03
    L-01

    Human-identical signaling peptides made through plant-based protein expression, designed to bring stem cell–inspired repair signals to skin.

SAFETY

BUILT FOR SENSITIVE SKIN

Dermatologist-tested on 51 people with sensitive skin. No irritation. No sensitization.2

51 People with sensitive skin2
0 Reactions2
100% Found it mild and non-irritating in our 28-day study1

QUESTIONS, ANSWERED

How soon will I notice a difference?

In our 28-day clinical study, every skin attribute evaluated had improved by about a third at day 14, and by more than half at day 28.1 Individual results vary.

Which results are from the product I’d actually buy?

Results marked ¹ are from the finished L-01 formula. ² is the sensitive-skin safety test. ³ and ⁴ are studies on the L-01 signaling-peptide ingredients. ⁵ is lab work on skin cells.

How does it compare to retinol?

In a 60-day head-to-head study, the L-01 signaling-peptide ingredients improved wrinkle depth by day 14. 0.3% retinol showed significant wrinkle improvement at day 30. Retinol improved pores; the L-01 ingredients did not.3

How do I use it?

Apply 2–3 pumps to damp skin after cleansing, morning and night. For the full ritual, start with L-00™ Facial Cleanser.

STUDY NOTES & REFERENCES

HOW WE REPORT RESULTS

Every number links here. We say what was tested (the finished formula, its ingredients, or skin cells in the lab) and who measured it.

Show study notes & references
  1. L-01 formula clinical study. A 28-day, single-center clinical study was conducted on 29 females, ages 25–54, with self-reported dull, loose skin lacking elasticity, and visible fine lines and wrinkles. L-01 was applied twice daily to the face. Efficacy and tolerance were evaluated at baseline, day 14, and day 28 by participant efficacy evaluation, dermatologist grading, and instrumental measurement (VISIA-CR imaging, Tewameter TM Hex), with dermatologist and instrumental evaluations performed on a n=10 cohort at baseline and day 28. Participant efficacy evaluation: skin attributes scored on a 0–9 scale under clinical conditions; percentages reflect mean score change from baseline (p<0.001, Wilcoxon signed-rank). Tolerance evaluation: percentage of participants in agreement on a 5-point scale.
  2. Sensitive-skin safety (RIPT). A dermatologist-tested human repeat insult patch test (RIPT) was conducted on 51 subjects with self-perceived sensitive skin, ages 22–65, Fitzpatrick II–IV. The test material was applied under occlusive patch for nine 48/72-hour induction exposures over three weeks, followed by a 10-day rest and a 48-hour challenge patch read at 48 and 96 hours (ICDRG scale, blinded grading). Under the conditions of the study, there was no indication of a potential to elicit dermal irritation or sensitization. ALS, Torrance, CA; Accession 1277439; 23 Feb – 01 Apr 2026.
  3. L-01 ingredient clinical studies. Independent clinical studies conducted by Lifeanalytics on the L-01 growth factor oleosome ingredients. Study 1: placebo-controlled, 60 adults, ages 30–65, cream applied twice daily for 28 days; firmness measured by Cutometer R0 at day 14 (+21.8% vs +2.5% placebo, p=0.0003), melanin by Mexameter MX18 at day 28 (−18.0% vs +2.0% placebo, p<0.0001), barrier by TEWL at day 28 (−16.9% vs −5.1% placebo, p=0.0004). Study 2: head-to-head, 44 adults, ages 40–65, growth factor oleosome serum vs 0.3% retinol serum, twice daily for 60 days; maximum wrinkle depth by Antera 3D (−18.6% at day 14, −25.5% at day 30); significant wrinkle improvement at day 14 vs day 30 for retinol. Tested as 1% EGF / 1% FGF-2 growth factor oleosome cream or serum, not as the finished L-01 formula.
  4. L-01 ingredient lab studies. Stability: in-vitro study, EGF-oleosome fusion vs naked EGF held at 42°C for 12 weeks; intact protein measured by SDS-PAGE band intensity (92% vs 8% of week 0). Measures intact protein, not biological activity. Delivery: ex vivo full-thickness skin model (EpiDermFT), FGF-2-oleosome vs naked FGF-2 at the same dose, Western blot at a single time point; oleosome-bound FGF-2 detected in epidermis and dermis, naked FGF-2 a faint trace in epidermis and none in dermis.
  5. L-01 complex, skin-cell (in vitro) study. Dermal fibroblasts treated with the L-01 complex at 3.01% (w/w) in an independent laboratory; 3 wells per group. Structure markers (collagen I, elastin, MMP-1) measured after UVA stress; senescence and SASP markers (P16, IL-6, TNF-α) after H₂O₂ oxidative stress; percentages vs stressed cells without L-01. “72% of UV-induced collagen loss prevented” is the share of the stress-induced decrease that L-01 prevented, calculated from group means. Regenerative repair measured by scratch (wound-gap) assay vs untreated cells, no stress model. All 7 markers p<0.05. Cell viability ≥95% up to about 4× the test dose. Lab results on cells. Full study in preparation for peer-reviewed publication.

Scientific references

A. López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G. Hallmarks of aging: an expanding universe. Cell. 2023;186(2):243–278.

B. Flament F, Bazin R, Laquieze S, et al. Effect of the sun on visible clinical signs of aging in Caucasian skin. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2013;6:221–232.

C. Fisher GJ, Datta SC, Talwar HS, et al. Molecular basis of sun-induced premature skin ageing and retinoid antagonism. Nature. 1996;379:335–339.

D. Ressler S, Bartkova J, Niederegger H, et al. p16INK4A is a robust in vivo biomarker of cellular aging in human skin. Aging Cell. 2006;5(5):379–389.

E. Brincat M, Kabalan S, Studd JW, et al. A study of the decrease of skin collagen content, skin thickness, and bone mass in the postmenopausal woman. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;70(6):840–845.

F. Khalid KA, Nawi AFM, Zulkifli N, et al. Aging and wound healing of the skin: a review of clinical and pathophysiological hallmarks. Life. 2022;12(12):2142.